As I wrote in my last post, Uranus has been the main factor behind the recent escalation in the Iran crisis, which should recede soon, as Uranus picks up speed. I think he is also the main factor in the latest financial crisis to hit the USA, as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the 2 giant mortgage companies, threaten to go bust. It has suddenly come into the news, rather than gradually building, and is very destabilising and disruptive for the US. So it’s very Uranian. The shares in the 2 companies halved in value the other day, which is extreme.
Meanwhile, as BBC News reports: ‘One of the largest US mortgage lenders, the California-based IndyMac Bank, has collapsed amid a growing credit crisis. Federal regulators seized the bank's assets, fearing it might not be able to meet withdrawals by depositors. It is the second-largest financial institution to fail in US history, regulators say.’ And the fifth US bank so far this year.The credit crunch keeps coming back, amid sporadic reports that the worst is over. The worst is not over, for good astrological reasons, if nothing else. Uranus is kicking off the bouts of instability, but the underlying and bigger theme is Pluto. With his move into Capricorn, underlying structural change to the financial system is needed. This has begun to be recognised, indeed it has been recognised for some time now. But it hasn’t been done. It will take time. So there will continue to be these bouts of instability, which may even escalate into much larger crises, until this change has been effected.
In June of 2007 there was the following item in the New York Times, which I wrote about: “The entire international economic architecture established after World War II – the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and what is now called the World Trade Organisation – is today facing questions about its relevance in a global economy.
The three institutions are buckling under the weight of globalisation, trade disputes and the ambitions of rising economic powers in Asia and elsewhere, experts and policy makers said.” This was even before the credit crunch came along.
Pluto in Sag revealed the inherent tendencies towards excess, recklessness and wastefulness within the western economic model, which Pluto in Capricorn will have to address. Pluto is currently having one last journey through the final degrees of Sag. He is currently retrograde. Retrograde motion forces us to look inwards and reflect in order to make the planet work well. And this retrograde Pluto is forcing us to look at the excesses and recklessness of the Sag period. We keep attempting to bandage up the situation and hope all will be well again (false Sag optimism). And then something like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac threatening to collapse reminds us yet again that there are these underlying structural issues. At the beginning of the current Pluto retrograde period we even saw the stockmarket recovering. Many people rightly did not trust this. It was Sagittarian false optimism. It is good that the stock market is low (but not unrealistically so). It means that somewhere we are looking steadily at the actual problems.
Pluto in Capricorn also concerns national security and governmental control. It is worth remembering, before we get too spooked by the spectre of Big Brother, that governments are often pretty inefficient, like any large organisation. Like last year, when the UK government managed to lose benefit data on 25 million people! More than anything, we need a sense of humour around governments and their blundering attempts to organise our lives. And we also need to remember that organisations, particularly large ones, are not very conscious. There is not some malign efficiency at the core of them, rather semi-conscious shuffles and bodges in various directions, which are beyond the ability of any single individual to do much about. I think that animal-herd behaviour is much the best model to describe collective humanity, however intelligent and aware the individuals within it may be.So this is what I mean when I say that Pluto in Capricorn will involve increased governmental control. It means that the herd will be shuffling in that direction for a while, there ain’t much we can do about it, but we can at least be aware of it and study it and above all have a sense of humour about it. OK, we see individuals who are able to manipulate that herd behaviour – like George Bush manipulating people’s fears after 9/11 – but he is still as much part of that collective as anyone, more so if anything, because he is functioning as a mouthpiece for certain aspects of that collective. Beware of a leader with an outer planet on an Angle, like Bush and his Pluto Rising!
This move towards greater government control was seen a couple of days ago when the US Senate approved a Bill to broaden wiretap powers. The Bill also included immunity for phone companies who had illegally wiretapped at the behest of the Bush administration. A lot of people aren’t happy about this. I think it is a bit like the torture at Abu Ghraib, where the junior soldiers were the ones who took the rap, and those further up, who had greater responsibility, got off. With the wire-tapping, the companies were going to get prosecuted, while the government, who had ordered it, was going to get off.
I’m sympathetic to the phone companies, because what do you do if you are an executive with a career and a mortgage and a family and the heavy-handed Bush government leans on you to wiretap? What are the consequences for you personally if you don’t comply? Wiretapping ain’t great, but it is not in the same league as torture. I couldn’t say that in the same position I would not have complied with the government. Of course, Bush isn’t giving the companies immunity for this reason. So it’s the right move, but for the wrong reasons.
It’s taken a long time to get this Bill through, during which time a temporary surveillance measure expired, ‘prompting accusations from Mr. Bush that the nation’s defenses against another strike by Al Qaeda had been weakened.’
This is where the whole surveillance thing started – 9/11. Get over it, will you! That was 7 years ago, and there hasn’t been a single further attack on the US mainland since. Even concerning 9/11, the USA could have avoided that if it hadn’t been asleep on the job and ignored obvious clues like Arabs taking flying lessons, but not being interested in learning to land! The government didn’t need any extra powers even then. For geographical reasons the US is remarkably safe from foreign attack.
So this is Pluto in Capricorn as government control for its own sake, based on fear rather than an accurate reading of the actual situation.
Barack Obama voted reluctantly in favour of the Bill, not because he didn’t want increased surveillance, but because he didn’t want the phone companies to have immunity. He wanted the increased powers because he says the world is becoming an increasingly dangerous place. I think he is right about that, but I also think it is a change in foreign policy which is the answer, rather than sitting on the population at home.
Barack Obama is a superb performer and a very talented politician. This lies behind much of his popularity. I think the election in November will be a no-contest. But you get a deeper sense of someone when you look at their policy decisions and the reasons behind them. Barack Obama is hard to get a personal sense of, which you would expect from Aquarius Rising. But decisions like this give me the sense of someone quite conservative, who is not able to think ‘outside of the box’, who is quite determined by the world he finds himself in. Also his comment to the Jewish lobby that he wanted to see Jerusalem remain the undivided capital of Israel. That is a conservative, right-wing thing to say, that can only inflame the Arab world.Obama is very good at standing for something. That is a huge asset as a politician, and it has given people huge expectations for him. I think his Aquarius Rising does give him a genuinely progressive approach will result in some good developments. But Aquarius is ruled by conservative Saturn as well as revolutionary Uranus. I think in many ways he will prove disappointingly conventional. Mixed in with all the talent and vision I can’t get out of my head the image of a kid (Sun in Leo) who is hungry for power (Moon square Pluto.) But that is politics as usual, and people as usual, so I’m not going to damn him for that, and he may well prove quite good as Presidents go.

11 comments:
You miss one very important point in the wiretapping immunity. Don't feel so sorry for those mid-career guys at the telecoms. They made their own choice.
Qwest was asked to wiretap and told the government no. The government went to the other telecoms. There have been, to date, no repercussions on Qwest from that action.
So the other telecoms made their own bed and now they don't even have to sleep in it.
I think if anyone is going to be prosecuted, it needs to start with the government.
It's unusual and admirable when a company acts like Qwest did. It's not very admirable when people bow down to government orders, but I think we have to expect it.
Particularly when you look at what happened to Valerie Plame when her husband blew the whistle on the Nigeria WMD claim. Or what happened to Kelly in the UK when he questioned the WMD claim and the kind of pressures he was then put under.
Unfortunately, because there has been so much misreporting and outright lying by the media and politicians about FISA it's understandable how people get it wrong.
President Bush from after 9/11 until well into 2007 deliberately and repeatedly broke the FISA law by having telecoms do surveillance of Americans’ communications without a warrant as required by FISA. What he did is a crime, a felony. And is not only an impeachable offence, but would subject an ordinary citizen to hard time in jail. And he did this not because he couldn’t get a warrant when needed from the FISA court, which has only twice in its thirty-year history declined to issue a warrant, and FISA allows for spying to begin even before a warrant is issued, but because he didn’t want to. Because he thinks he’s above the law. Just like Nixon, whose actions prompted the FISA law to be enacted in the first place, and who thought that, “If the president does it, it must be legal.”
I don’t know about the UK, but in the US the government cannot order companies to do its bidding. The telecoms that cooperated with Bush did so not because they were ordered to or were being “leaned on,” but because the contracts they garnered for doing government spying profited them bigtime! The Qwest CEO who refused to participate in what he thought was illegal government surveillance was subsequently prosecuted by the Bush administration for insider trading. In his defense he submitted documentation showing that the Bush administration had been negotiating huge surveillance programs with telecoms long before 9/11.
The only reason passage of this revision of the FISA law has been delayed is because of the persistent outcry by the public, and by a few senators and congressmen, against the theft of 4th amendment rights by this new law. Furthermore, telecom retroactive immunity closes the door to finding out for some time, if ever, the extent of the spying on Americans that has gone on.
Barack Obama promised during the primary that he would filibuster any bill that had retroactive telecom immunity in it. Although called a “compromise,” this bill is a total capitulation by the democrats, and gives the president even more power than the version the Senate passed. And Obama is well aware that he is lying when he calls this bill a “compromise.” In this as well as other actions by him since becoming the designated nominee, he begins to show the Neptune square Sun and Pluto square Moon. Like Bush, this is a man that cannot be trusted!
By Venus
More than anything, we need a sense of humour around governments and their blundering attempts to organise our lives.
.....................Capricorn is known for its quirky sense of humour so maybe in the end that is the way western Governments will be brought up short - by being laughed at.
Capricorn is also about liking order but it can be a very moral sign and if another is being hurt then that is not on - witness the 10p debacle - people did not think it was fair and the Government could not see it till forced to do so by those on the 'streets'. When Pluto returns to Capricorn there is a chance the 10p issue will be sorted out correctly and in a proper moral business like manner.
I am probably being too optimistic - but all you see is dire predictions for Pluto in Capricorn. From my own Capricorn view, and observing other Capricorns, Capricorns get younger and happier and more tolerant as they gets older So maybe Capricorn will put things into a correct moral order and then enjoyment can start. Then again look at the states which are under a Capricorn rule - no on second thoughts dont look at them that is a view which is leading to all those dire predicitons for Pluto in Capricorn.
It's fine for you to say, "But that is politics as usual, and people as usual, so I’m not going to damn him for that, and he may well prove quite good as Presidents go."
It's not YOUR COUNTRY, is it?
Obama is the biggest fraud since George W, in fact he IS the left's GW Bush. He mesmerized a base hungry for something they could believe in, told them what they wanted to hear, and now that he thinks he's got in in the bag, his true colors are already showing.
As a politician, he's as dirty as they come. His despiciable tactics for early wins in Illinois were proof enough of that, but his ability to hypnotize the left meant they didn't bother to scrutinize his past before voting for him.
God help America. It's voters are idiots.
Let's see.
Postscript:
"The Detainee Treatment Act. The Military Commissions Act. The Protect America Act. The FISA Amendments Act. They're all rooted in the same premise: that our highest government leaders have the power to ignore our laws with impunity, and when they're caught, they should be immunized and protected, not punished."
http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/index.html
by Venus
Venus, you have a sharp awareness which is frustrating, I know, when all about voices/minds that echo back blunt your edge or try to jolly it up.
You are talking about all things taken together give us a pretty clear picture, esp taken the absence of habeus corpus and our shredded constitution mean we have no more protections of any sort.
Whatever it is Obama stands for I have yet to hear what any of it is.
His current commercial brags about kicking 80% of needy families off welfare rolls, children having healthcare (they ALREADY have it, just their parents, 15 million of them are vulnerable to sudden death from catastropic illness/accident and unrelenting worry about leaving their "covered" children orphaned).
Don't expect these working stiffs to get one descriptive acknowlegement of their desperate situation from Mr. Obama.
Knowing he would lose public funding when revealing his "true" intentions, he withdraws, then we get the following:
Pro death penalty
Pro gun
Pro wiretapping
Pro NAFTA, CAFTA
Plus slow wet tongue-licking the faces of the worst like Lieberman and bluedogs like Harold Ford and many others.
Oh, lest we overlook the simultaneous ingress of both mars and pluto into capricorn just before the inauguration 1-20-09.
It is head-bangingly frustrating that we've learned nothing from 8 years with bush, a do-nothing congress who we voted in to HELP us in 11-06 and set out immediately to betray us...
and now we're once again asked to "trust" Obama without a speck of this trust EARNED. We must be stone stupid and barking mad. I think since the tap on the shoulder, the kick in the pants didn't work, the piano will drop on our heads. Gawd!
(don't tell me he's better than McCain which is avoidance of the entire package. Of course. I suspect they'll drag in Bush's doughy brother Jeb in FL for VP, KNOWING McCain's clock is running short)
Which plate shall we choose, the one with shit, or the one with vomit.
It would be negligent of me to not leave you with this brilliant video discussion with the best constitutional lawyer we've got and Rachel Maddow. He thinks it's down to other countries stepping in to stop the U.S. (which he thought he would never see in his lifetime):
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/07/12/international-committee-of-red-cross-says-bush-administration-guilty-of-war-crimes/#comments
A shiver went up my spine when I heard of the run on Northern Rock, coincidentally just as Pluto went into Capricorn.
Completely agree about Obama...I think he will be less revolutionary then everybody imagines. And I think Hilary would have been more revolutionary if she had won.(I think she was keeping it all under her hat).
Love your blog by the way and have put a link to it on mine...
You have an impressive diverstity of comment here - I've never seen anything like it. Congratulations!
I wonder whether there isn't a feature in the next 10 years or so that you are underestimating - the ability of people to speak up - as they have done here.
The original way of coordinating an organization was to have one person at the top to do it and some top-down control. Management theorists acknowledge that this is no longer possible. In organizations such as Google (see Gary Hamel interviewing CEO Eric Schmidt on You Tube), the CEO makes sure people speak up and keeps people aware of the commercial realities - feeds in how there work will survive in a commercial way. He is not the "boss" though and not the source of coordination. Speaking up is the source of coordination.
I'd be interested in your views. And congratulations again on stimulating reactions from such diverse audience!
Post a Comment